NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad

NNSquad Home Page

NNSquad Mailing List Information

 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ NNSquad ] Re: NY Times: Verizon offers system to improve P2P transfers


Frank A. Coluccio wrote:
Verizon continues to stand out from the pack in a growing number of new and
interesting ways. Whether this reaching out to P2P users is legit, or involves
hidden gotchas, remains to be seen. Although, if the abundance of bandwidth
afforded by its FiOS offering is any indication of its philosophical bent,
then I'd be inclined to think that it's for real, especially when one
considers the efficiencies that Verizon itself stands to gain from this
approach. ...
Verizon certainly has been displaying some Internet-savvy behavior, very much a refreshing change from the old days when the telco guys just didn't "get" data. Of course, Verizon has the luxury (as Frank notes) of FiOS bandwidth in their latest P2P / P4P project. While P4P might be a win for Verizon, it will likely still bring a typical cable (e.g., Comcast) network to its knees. So this is a great marketing advantage for FiOS. Tech savvy or market savvy? Clearly both, which is a powerful combination.

So far, Verizon seems to have an interesting mix of understanding the technology (for instance, they went full fiber to the premises FiOS rather than ATT Uverse fiber to the neighborhood) combined with older more restrictive ideas that haven't been exorcised yet (residential TOS restrictions on running a server, blocking port 25, maybe port 80 as well, etc.).

Which brings an excellent point: Technically, one of these new Verizon P4P nodes is a server. Will Verizon finally clean up their residential TOS as well as stopping the across-the-board port 25 blocking (vs. just blocking "offenders" such as Comcast used to do before they started blocking 25 nearly randomly)? It would seem Verizon's TOS is incompatible with their own P4P. Of course, there's no viable technical or legal definition of "server" especially since MIT / X-Windows turned it inside out.

But one has little legal recourse in ISP negotiations these days. Don't like it? Go elsewhere! Oh -- wait -- there's nowhere else to go. Which is part of what NNSquad is about.

In the end, my bet is if Verizon P4P makes it out of the labs and sees the light of day, it will just be classified as a "non-server" application by the sole judge and jury (Verizon), and thus no TOS change is required.