NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
NNSquad Home Page
NNSquad Mailing List Information
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ NNSquad ] Re: UDP Wars
- To: nnsquad@nnsquad.org
- Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: UDP Wars
- From: Brett Glass <nnsquad@brettglass.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:17:03 -0700
At 10:26 AM 12/3/2008, Lauren Weinstein wrote:
It's time that we stop looking at the Internet only as a patchwork
of independent, typically unregulated networks,
To do so would be to change the fundamental design of the Internet.
Remember, the "Internet" was designed to be exactly that: a loose
federation of independently owned, operated, and managed networks
which could communicate -- if the owners so chose -- with one
another. The institutions which designed and formed the Internet
needed, and insisted upon autonomy -- including the ability to set
their own management policies and terms of service. In doing so,
they intended to depart from the business and operational models of
the centrally managed, omnipresent Bell System monopoly that
prevailed at the time.
and more in terms of
an overall interconnected system that may need some level and forms of
oversight similar to those long considered appropriate for other
critical utility-related functions.
Such burdensome regulation and micromanagement would, effectively,
turn the Internet back into the Bell System of old, paving the way
for a monopoly or at best a duopoly. This would be the worst
possible outcome, in my opinion, for consumers and for consumer
choice. And by unnecessarily imposing centralized control and
eliminating diversity, it would stifle innovation. Any such
regulatory system would also be subject to regulatory capture by
large corporations (e.g. Google) which could see an advantage in
bending the system to their specific interests.
In short, a "utility" model would kill the Internet as we know it,
replacing it with an unresponsive, homogeneous duopoly which would
hinder innovation as least as much as the Bell System of old did
when it refused even to allow you to fit a plastic pipe over the
mouthpiece of your phone. And because the regulation would always
cover the one or two providers available to you (no independents
such as my own company would be able to survive), you'd have no
opportunity to find another provider that might be more hospitable.
--Brett Glass