NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
NNSquad Home Page
NNSquad Mailing List Information
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ NNSquad ] Re: User sues AT&T after $5000+ bill for exceeding 5 GB bandwidth cap
- To: NNSquad <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: User sues AT&T after $5000+ bill for exceeding 5 GB bandwidth cap
- From: Barry Gold <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:43:38 -0800
Brett Glass wrote:
At 04:50 PM 3/3/2009, Sean Bradly wrote:
However, this is what not what AT&T elects to charge you for
15GB/month: ($60+$5000(10GB overage))*12(months)*2(years). *That's
$121,440 folks. That's 2800% markup.* Thats a 30 year mortgage.
That's a bargain. It's a fraction of the cost of the spectrum needed to
deliver that much bandwidth. Remember, companies like AT&T bid up to $3
million on tiny 5 MHz slivers of spectrum, which one user could consume
completely by downloading data 24x7.
Then neither AT&T nor anybody else could make money by selling that
_first_ 50GB for $60/month. They would be losing money the way GM is,
and soon be out of business, or at least out of the ISP business.
I think Brett's mistake is mixing up the cost of _cellphone_ bandwidth
with the cost of transporting bits by other means. Understandable,
because Brett _is_ in the wireless ISP business.
But most large ISPs aren't wireless. They have large cable plants,
either for deliver phone service (Telcos) or for delivering cable TV
(cablecos). While those cable plants cost a lot to build, most of them
are already partly or totally amortized by the existing telephone or
cable business model. (I'm almost sure that some of them have been
completely "depreciated" by now, especially in the largest and densest
Similarly with the cost of transporting those bits between ISPs. Most
large ISPs are _already_ "tier 1" providers and peer with other Tier 1
providers, either without settlements or with settlements at a much
lower rate than the cost of cellphone bandwidth.
I suspect most of the traffic is carried by landlines of one sort or
another. Or they are carried by microwave, but it doesn't use expensive
frequency spectrum that covers an entire city. It uses some chunk of
frequency spectrum from dish A to dish B, with essentially no
interference to or from other users of the _same_ spectrum using dishes
that are pointed somewhere else.
The only time the spectrum even starts to get scarce (and expensive) is
if you have to go through a satellite (because the signal spreads out to
about 2 degrees of longitude (or was that 2 minutes -- it's been a long
time since I read the Cato Journal article on satellite scarcity) by the
time you get to geostationary orbit).