NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
NNSquad Home Page
[ NNSquad ] Did YouTube Really Block Michelle Obama's DNC Speech for Copyright Infringement?
Did YouTube Really Block Michelle Obama's DNC Speech for Copyright Infringement? http://j.mp/OQe20R (This message on Google+) - - - http://j.mp/OQexrV (Slate) "Either way, this amounts to something less than a copyright apocalypse. Michelle Obama's speech is still available on plenty of other YouTube channels, including here, here, and here. But on the heels of the Hugo Awards debacle, it's another reminder of the need for human vigilance against overzealous digital-rights-management algorithms. In a statement chalking up the glitch to "a technical error on YouTube," an Obama campaign official added, "We do not expect tonight's coverage will be affected." Copyright bots, the gauntlet has been thrown!" - - - Irrespective of this particular case, this whole area (not just YouTube) of automated content flagging needs serious attention from a number of standpoints. Here's an example of what has happened to me (and many other people). I uploaded a video of mine that included a segment of old, definitely public domain material. Shortly thereafter, my entire vid was flagged by YouTube's Content ID. Why? It took some digging to figure out, but it turns out a Content ID partner had uploaded a video of their own that happened to include a section of the same public domain material I had used. This apparently made it look like my video was infringing, since Content ID assumed the section of my vid that matched their vid was in violation. Wrong! But Content ID partners get the assumption of being correct, and there's no way for an average user to assert that something is public domain a priori. I was able to get this reversed by careful explanation on the appropriate forms, but I wonder how many people would just throw up their arms and say, "To hell with it!" and not bother? This is not an easy situation to solve, but the explicit assumption that Content ID partners are correct and that takedowns or other actions are immediate -- with a protest required to get blocks, etc. removed after the fact, strikes me as increasingly problematic. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein (firstname.lastname@example.org): http://www.vortex.com/lauren Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org/pfir-info Founder: - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com/privacy-info - Data Wisdom Explorers League: http://www.dwel.org - Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: http://www.gctip.org Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com Google+: http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter: http://vortex.com/t-lauren Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com _______________________________________________ nnsquad mailing list http://lists.nnsquad.org/mailman/listinfo/nnsquad