NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
[ NNSquad ] Berec (EU regulators) approach to net neutrality published
Yesterday Berec, the group of EU regulators, have published an Overview and a Summary of BERECâs approach to net neutrality they adopted at the BEREC Plenary on 6 December 2012. you can find it here: http://is.gd/SUGrl1I suggest reading (at least)BoR (12) 146: âSummary of BEREC positions on net neutralityâ some highlights: While QoS differentiation may be an appropriate tool to deal with scarcity of bandwidth in access networks, e.g. by prioritising voice services, the situation is different in IP-backbone networks, where additional capacity is cheaper.... Up to now, interconnection with QoS assured across network boundaries has not, or has hardly, existed in practice. As described in BERECâs comments to specific proposals for ITU/WCIT7, over the internet, a guaranteed end-to-end QoS offer appears neither commercially nor technically realistic. In best effort networks, alternative mechanisms for improving performance have been developed and have proven to be more efficient and cost effective, such as end-point-based congestion control for reduction of the traffic load, Internet Exchange Points and the increased use of peering as well as content delivery networks (CDNs). While QoS differentiation may be an appropriate tool to deal with scarcity of bandwidth in access networks, e.g. by prioritising voice services, the situation is different in IP-backbone networks, where additional capacity is cheaper.... At this stage it is worth noting that there is no evidence that operatorsâ network costs are not already fully covered and paid for in the Internet value chain, unlike what is sometimes alleged by some ISPs in the net neutrality debate. Both sides of the market, content and application providers (CAPs) on the one hand, and users of applications on the other, contribute to paying for Internet connectivity (and hosting). CAPs also pay for CDN services that bring their content closer to the end user.... BEREC proposes to evaluate the âreasonablenessâ of traffic management practices and contractual restrictions by applying the following assessment criteria:(i) Non-discrimination between players. The practice is done on a nondiscriminatory basis among all CAPs.(ii) End-user control. It is an important indicator of reasonableness when the practice is applied on the request of users at the edge, who can control and deactivate it. The level of control is deemed higher when the user does not incur costs for removing a restriction.(iii) Efficiency and proportionality. The measures should be limited to what is necessary to fulfil the objective, in order to minimise possible side effects. The intensity of the practice, such as frequency and reach, is also important when assessing its impact.(iv) Application agnosticism. As long they are able to achieve a similar effect, BEREC expresses a general preference for âapplication-agnosticâ practices. This reflects the fact that the decoupling of the network and application layers is a characteristic feature of the open Internet, and has enabled innovation and growth.... Competition plays a vital role in guaranteeing net neutrality: the greater the pressure created by competition, the higher the quality of access products and the less incentive an ISP will have to diminish the quality of its own services. Competition is expected to discipline operators and result in the best offers for end users.In accordance with the European framework, NRAs have a duty to stimulate competitive dynamics in the retail markets with ex-ante regulation at the wholesale level ciao, s.-- blog.quintarelli.it_______________________________________________nnsquad mailing listhttp://lists.nnsquad.org/mailman/listinfo/nnsquad