NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
NNSquad Home Page
NNSquad Mailing List Information
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ NNSquad ] Re: define: "service providers have to manage their networks somehow, especially during peak times."
- To: Colin May <email@example.com>
- Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: define: "service providers have to manage their networks somehow, especially during peak times."
- From: Wes Felter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:14:14 -0500
- Cc: email@example.com
Colin May wrote:
On 27 Mar 2008, at 20:30, Wes Felter wrote:
I like the idea of customers marking their traffic, but realistically
customers would have to rely on their Linksys router to mark traffic
for them, and right now the router doesn't do that. In the near term,
ISPs are going to have to treat all traffic from a customer equally.
Surely there is too much
chance of abuse from the people who are using the majority of bandwidth
to flag all their traffic up for preferential treatment?
It goes without saying that any QoS scheme must not be gameable by
customers. Packet marking could be used to determine *which* packets are
dropped, but not *how many*. For example, if an ISP needs to drop 1% of
Alice's traffic, and 50% of her traffic is marked low priority, then 2%
of the low-priority packets will be dropped and none of the
high-priority packets will be dropped. If Bob marks all his traffic as
high priority and the ISP needs to drop 1% of it, then the ISP will
simply choose a random 1% to drop. In this case, it doesn't benefit Bob
to mark all his traffic as high-priority.
In summary, two levels of QoS are required. The first level decides how
much bandwidth each customer gets, and this decision is based only on
how much the customer pays and the level of congestion. Within the
allocated bandwidth there is another level of QoS which decides which
packets to drop, and it is a good idea to allow customers to choose.
Wes Felter - firstname.lastname@example.org