NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
NNSquad Home Page
NNSquad Mailing List Information
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ NNSquad ] Re: NY Times: People are watching much more online video
- To: nick hatch <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: NY Times: People are watching much more online video
- From: Kriss Andsten <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:07:13 +0100
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 31 okt 2008, at 05.27, nick hatch wrote:
I see Comcast's move to cap at 250GB as a sticking their toes in the
water, and perhaps trying to set a precident at the same time. I
don't see a techincal reason for the caps. They don't even
differentiate between outbound/inbound traffic. Considering their
network architecture where last-mile egress bandwidth is so scarce,
that alone makes the whole move seem like a farce.
I'm not sure that I agree there. I don't think I've seen (which is not
a synonym for "I categorically deny that it exists") a single capped
service that differentiated between upstream and downstream bandwidth.
It's easy enough to shape the available bandwidth for each direction
independently if that's what you want to do, but it's a whole other
ballgame explaining a differentiated quota to millions of users.