NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
[ NNSquad ] Re: Fractional connections / duty cycles / usage caps
I'd like to distinguish between three cases:
A) You buy a connection with X% duty cycle and the ISP prevents you from sending/receiving more than that. Your bill is the same every month.
B) You buy a connection with Y GB/month usage cap, but the ISP allows you to exceed it and then charges you (a lot) more money.
C) You buy a connection with Y GB/month usage cap, but the ISP allows you to exceed it and then cancels your account if you do.
(I assume the reader understands that a duty cycle and a usage cap are the same thing, just expressed in different ways.)
I think A is good but B and C are bad. (I think all three options should be legal, but I'm not talking about legalities in this message.) I *want* a bursty Internet connection because my usage is bursty, but I also want some kind of "safety valve" that keeps my bill under control. In summary, usage caps are good *when implemented properly*, but *virtually all broadband ISPs are implementing usage caps wrong*. When an ISP says "your bill will be somewhere between $50 and $150" the resulting customer outrage is entirely predictable and IMO justified.
Wes Felter