NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
[ NNSquad ] Re: Is network unneutrality necessarily bad?
|
True -- but it would be far better if we can simply assume
encrypted paths and thus be able to maintain direct relationships between end points
and objects. If I want to read my photos into a directory I should need to do
any setup -- just specify a name of the directory. One consequences of the combination
of the lack of encryption, the lack of stable naming and the twisting billing passages
that compromise today’s computing/connectivity milieu is that we’ve
lost the ability to assume an app “just works”. Instead we must
make sure that every little switch and setting and billing relationship along
the path is just right. This is a bit off list because it’s about the
insidious lack of neutrality that we’ve become inured to so it there won’t
be rage until people can step back and recognize the NN they’ve always
known. -----Original Message----- On Nov 13, 2007 4:42 PM, Bob Frankston
<Bob19-0501@bobf.frankston.com> wrote: > But if you do a remote terminal connection
(encrypted) to your system at > home you can do a > > NET USE * \\TSClient\C > > back to your laptop (if you've shared the disk drives).
This makes it very > easy to copy files from your home system. This is
very very useful. But this is encapsulated in the remote desktop
connection, is it not? So, while you are using netbios, it is not running bare
over the Internet. In other words, an access-list on the ISP
router that blocks netbios traffic will not affect this at all... -- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold XenoPhage0@gmail.com http://blog.godshell.com |